Mon–Fri: 10:00 – 18:00 
Request a call 
Generative Engine Optimization — also written GEO, AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) or LLM SEO — is the discipline of getting your brand and content cited and surfaced inside large language models like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude, and the answer engines layered on top of them. Where traditional SEO optimises for blue-link SERPs, GEO optimises for natural-language responses where the user never sees a list of results — they see an answer with one or two citations.
For B2B SaaS and Fintech in 2026, this matters because between 15% and 30% of buyer research already happens inside an LLM before the buyer ever visits Google. If your competitors are cited by ChatGPT and you aren’t, you lose the pipeline before the funnel begins.
How GEO / AEO / LLM SEO differs from traditional SEO
Traditional SEO targets ten blue links on a SERP. The buyer scans, clicks, lands. GEO targets the AI’s training data and retrieval layer. The buyer asks a question, the AI synthesises an answer, and decides which 1–3 sources to cite. You either get cited or you don’t exist.
Three concrete differences:
- Ranking signal mix — backlinks still matter, but entity recognition, schema markup, citation patterns from authoritative sources, and structured Q&A formatting matter much more. An LLM doesn’t run PageRank — it builds a probabilistic citation network.
- Content format — the LLM rewards content that answers questions completely and atomically. Long-form pillar articles still work, but each section must be self-contained enough that it can be quoted in isolation.
- Brand entity strength — LLMs rely heavily on knowledge graph signals (Wikipedia, Wikidata, structured organisation data, sameAs links). Getting your brand into LLM training requires consistent off-page entity signals across the open web.
How LLMs actually decide what to cite
Most LLM responses to commercial queries follow a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pattern. The model fetches snippets from indexed content using a vector search, then synthesises an answer citing those snippets. The signals that determine retrieval:
- Topical authority — your domain must demonstrate depth on the specific topic, not breadth across unrelated topics. A focused B2B SaaS SEO site beats a generalist agency site for SaaS-specific queries.
- Citation graph centrality — being cited by other authoritative pages on the same topic creates a citation cluster that LLMs detect. Backlink quality > backlink quantity.
- Structured data and schema markup — Organization, Service, Article, FAQPage, HowTo schemas all feed the knowledge graph and give LLMs reliable entity anchors.
- Answer format — content structured as direct Q&A, numbered steps, or definition-then-elaboration ranks higher in retrieval. LLMs prefer content that’s already structured the way they want to output.
- Recency and freshness — for time-sensitive queries (pricing, features, 2026 trends), LLMs heavily prefer fresh content with explicit dates.
The GEO / AEO methodology we use for B2B SaaS
Our GEO programme for B2B SaaS and Fintech clients runs in six phases.
Phase 1 — Entity audit. We map your brand’s current presence in Wikidata, Wikipedia, Crunchbase, LinkedIn knowledge graphs, GitHub (if applicable), Bloomberg / S&P entity registries. We identify the entity-level gaps that cause LLMs to either miss you or confuse you with similarly-named companies.
Phase 2 — Citation gap analysis. We test your queries inside ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google’s AI Overviews. Who gets cited for the queries you should win? Why? This produces a citation gap list — competitors we need to displace in LLM responses.
Phase 3 — Schema and structured data implementation. Organization, Service, FAQPage, HowTo, Article schema across all commercial pages. SameAs links connecting your social profiles and external entity registries. Knowledge graph optimisation.
Phase 4 — Citation-worthy content production. We rewrite your high-intent commercial pages to be retrieval-optimised: clear definitions, numbered steps, atomic answers, explicit citations of primary sources. Each page is structured so that any 2–3 paragraphs can be quoted in isolation without losing meaning.
Phase 5 — Off-site citation building. Authority publication placements (DR 80+ sources LLMs treat as trustworthy: industry trade media, university research citations, government data references). We avoid PBN networks — LLMs detect those clusters and discount them.
Phase 6 — Monitoring and iteration. Monthly LLM citation reports. We test 50–100 commercial queries across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude monthly, tracking which queries we appear in, which competitors we displace, which gaps remain.
Tools and tactics specific to LLM SEO
- Prompt SEO — crafting your content so common buyer prompts naturally retrieve your snippets. We use Perplexity’s source view + ChatGPT plugins to reverse-engineer which content patterns get cited for which intent classes.
- Schema engineering — beyond standard Yoast schema. Custom JSON-LD for Service, Article, HowTo, FAQPage, Organization with full SameAs network.
- Vector embedding optimisation — ensuring your content’s semantic embeddings align with the embeddings of high-intent buyer queries. Tooling: OpenAI embeddings API + cosine similarity testing.
- Citation chain mapping — identifying which 5–10 authoritative pages, if they cite us, would push us into LLM retrieval consistently. Then earning those citations through digital PR, original research, and contributor placements.
- Brand entity hardening — Wikipedia and Wikidata entries, Crunchbase profile depth, LinkedIn Organisation page completeness, Google Business Profile (where applicable).
Industries and use cases where GEO matters most
Generative engine optimization is highest-leverage for businesses whose buyers do extended research before purchasing — typically B2B with deal sizes above $5k and consideration windows above 30 days:
- B2B SaaS — buyers ask LLMs for «best X tool for Y company size» before opening a single tab. If you’re not cited, you’re not on the shortlist.
- Fintech and financial services — high-trust queries where the LLM’s citation choice often makes or breaks the buyer’s first impression.
- Professional services (legal, accounting, consulting) — buyers ask «what to look for in a [profession] for [situation]» before vetting providers.
- Enterprise software with complex evaluation — RFP-driven sales where the procurement team uses LLMs to build vendor longlists.
- Developer tools and API products — developer audience uses ChatGPT / Claude / Cursor / Continue as primary research tools; getting cited in code-context LLMs determines awareness.
Realistic timelines and expectations
Generative engine optimization is slower-compounding than traditional SEO at first, then accelerates faster. Expect:
- Months 1–3 — entity audit, schema implementation, content restructuring. No measurable LLM citation change yet.
- Months 4–6 — first citations begin appearing for niche queries. Brand entity strengthening shows up in Wikipedia visibility and Google knowledge panels.
- Months 7–12 — citation network builds. You begin appearing in 10–30% of target commercial queries inside ChatGPT and Perplexity. Compounding accelerates as more authoritative sources cite you.
- Year 2+ — entity becomes self-reinforcing. LLMs treat your brand as a default reference for your niche.
Anyone selling «rank in ChatGPT in 30 days» is selling smoke. LLM citation networks compound the same way Google’s link graph compounded in 2003–2008 — slowly, then suddenly.
Pricing and engagement model
Our GEO / AEO / LLM SEO programmes run from €4,500/month minimum, 6-month commitment. The work is senior-only — LLM optimisation requires understanding of vector embeddings, knowledge graph structure, schema engineering, and citation network dynamics. We don’t junior-staff these engagements.
The programme typically pairs with our existing European SEO programmes (clients running both report 2–3× higher pipeline contribution from organic + AI sources combined).
Why choose Global One Digital for GEO
We are early adopters of LLM SEO because our team has both the SEO depth and the technical engineering background to implement schema engineering and vector embedding analysis. Most traditional SEO agencies stop at «add JSON-LD to your homepage» — we do the deeper structural work that actually changes LLM retrieval behaviour.
We work primarily with B2B SaaS and Fintech in USA, Europe, and CIS (excluding RU/BY). Our existing European SEO programme work integrates directly with GEO — clients on both programmes see compounding effects faster than either programme run alone.
Frequently asked questions about GEO / AEO / LLM SEO
Is GEO replacing traditional SEO? No. They run in parallel. Google still drives the majority of clickable traffic to commercial pages. GEO captures the upstream awareness layer — buyers who first encounter your brand inside an LLM and then search for it directly.
How do I measure GEO results? Monthly LLM citation testing across 50–100 target queries in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude. We report: % of queries where you appear, % where you appear in top 1–3 citations, citation displacement vs named competitors.
Does GEO work for non-English markets? Yes, especially in well-resourced languages (German, French, Spanish). LLM training is heavily English-biased so non-English entity networks are sparser — meaning emerging brands have a faster path to citation in those markets.
Can we do GEO ourselves? The schema engineering and entity audit pieces are technical but learnable. The citation network building requires editorial relationships and is the slowest piece — that’s where agencies add the most value.
Will GEO hurt our traditional SEO? No. The schema engineering, structured Q&A content, and citation building all help traditional SEO too. There’s no trade-off.
